|
|
Federal Report on Disabled Access to Federal Lands June 2000 |
|||||
|
|
||||||
| Source: | ||||||
| Improving Access to Outdoor Recreation
Activities on Federal Land Prepared for the US Department of Interior and Us Department of Agriculture Prepared by Wildness Inquiry June 27, 2000 http://www.wildernessinquiry.org/accessreport.pdf |
||||||
| Important Excerpts from Report: | ||||||
| "Access for people with disabilities is often perceived as a secondary consideration to other, more pressing needs. One of the underlying issues here is that many people (not just federal land managers) tend to "pigeon hole" the access issue as simply another special need of yet another minor constituency." "Many people consider access to recreation a lower priority when compared to issues of employment, |
||||||
| Coalition Note: This is the typical anti-crossbow argument of: "The ADA was designed for employment and building access, not hunting and fishing". But the report goes on to describe why equality in the outdoors is so important: | ||||||
| "Yet, in whatever form people chose, most people agree that the ability to recreate with peers is one of the greatest, most rewarding elements of life... For most people, the accommodations they make in a social, recreational context do translate into other areas of life—including employment, health care, and access to basic services such as the use of restrooms. This is why increasing opportunities for integrated outdoor recreation is so important—it serves as an |
||||||
| Coalition Note: This
fight is about more than equality in the woods, it is about equality in
life. |
||||||
|
"[T]he primary reason for slow progress is that providing equal opportunities for outdoor recreation for persons with
disabilities is a relatively low priority among the leadership of all federal land management agencies." |
||||||
| Coalition Note: Disabled
hunters face so many problems today, simply because no one knows how to
challenge issues, and state or other government officials tell them
“That’s just the way this issue is handled”. Recent investigations
performed by the Coalition have uncovered blatant ADA violations within
hunting regulations in many states. These violations exist today simply
because nobody knows how to fight them. |
||||||
|
"[Another] major obstacle to promoting greater opportunities for accessibility is the perception among many land managers that
many accessibility initiatives are simply disguised efforts to repeal policies and practices intended to
protect natural resources...This negative reaction among land managers is most unfortunate, because it instantly polarizes
discussions about access and casts doubt on the motives of people and organizations who advocate
for legitimate opportunities for improved access to outdoor recreation. |
||||||
| Coalition Note: Unfortunately,
defenders of disability rights are often accused of having ulterior
motives. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Coalition Note: The report contained many recommendations to improving disabled access. Specifically, these 3 recommendations were given for disabled hunting programs: | ||||||
| 1) "Use gate systems that allow passage of a wheelchair through or around the gate. This is already a requirement for newly constructed gates, however, this requirement needs to be enforced, and, ideally, applied to existing gates where access around the gate is essential to the programs provided (hunting, hiking, wildlife viewing, etc.)." |
||||||
| Coalition Note: The
inability for disabled individuals to maneuver around public forest gates
is an issue we have just begun to investigate, and you will be seeing more
about it very soon on the Coalition web site. Another issue being
discussed with the federal government at this time is the inability of
disabled anglers to access a 65-mile stretch of a significant salmon
fishery. Presently the Coalition is taking a look at both of these issues
in Washington State. |
||||||
| 2) "The creation of “Special” hunting areas or seasons for persons with disabilities, should be done ONLY as a last resort for providing programmatic access to persons with disabilities when integration into regular hunting seasons is deemed impossible. Every effort should be made to integrate persons with disabilities into hunting areas and seasons that are available to the general public" |
||||||
| Coalition Note: This
recommendation simply states that states should do everything in their power
to accommodate disabled hunters in the regular hunting season. Special
disabled hunts should not be offered in lieu of regular season
accommodations.
It is felt that separate hunting areas or seasons does nothing to
integrate the disabled into a state hunting program, but strives instead
to push the disabled out of the original state run program. It would be
much better to allow the disabled to use the tools their disability
requires them to use to be able to hunt as equals with able-bodied hunters
in the regular hunting seasons. |
||||||
| 3) "Special permits for crossbow and rifle use in areas and seasons where they are prohibited should be allowed as a reasonable accommodation ONLY as a last resort to individuals who can prove that their disability will not allow them to safely or effectively use equipment that is allowed to the general public. |
||||||
| Coalition Note: Note
that this recommends the allowance of crossbows when disabled individuals
can prove they can not safely or effectively use traditional or
standard archery equipment. This does not say "Allow
crossbows only as a last resort, when all other accommodations
fail.", as is the practice in states such as New York,
which force disabled hunters to use the Modified-Bow accommodation except
under the strictest of circumstance. Forcing hunters to use an accommodation
which does not fit their individual needs deters hunters from
participating in the public hunting season. The ADA prohibits states from
enacting regulations which erect barriers to participation, or screens out
disabled individuals. |
||||||